During the years 2005 – 2012, I have sent several letters to The Hindu, some of which were published in the next day’s Edition. Other letters were not accepted for publication. In my webpage (EA>Other Comments) I had given links to the online version of The Hindu for the letters published and given the links to the text of the unpublished letters. Recently, I note that the online versions are no longer availble with the links shared in the website. I am collecting these letters in this blog, giving the date and topic. Few more letters sent until 2015 will be covered in another blog later. I started blogging after this and noone could censor my words!
5 November 2005: Rounding off credit card bills to the higher value in Rupees by Reliance: Not published.
Dear Editor,
I have been using the mobile services from Reliance for more than two years now. Reliance has come up with an easy way of making millions from unsuspecting users. I get a monthly statement from Reliance as a postpaid customer for the dues. The amound due is always rounded off to the next higher rupees. For example, my bill for August 2004 shows “Amount payable as Rs. 91.01” and the “Amount due as Rs. 92”. I was hoping Reliance would stop this practice but it seems to continue. For October 2005, my current bill is Rs 199.38 and the amount due is Rs 200. I do not know the number of subscribers Reliance has today. If they have 1 million subscribers, on an average, Reliance can make more than Rs. 500,000 per month just by rounding off numbers this way. I would like to bring this to the attention of all users and the authorities concerned. Incidentally, today I received my electricity bill for this month. Our BESCOM knows how to round off numbers correctly. If the accounts Department in Reliance needs a tuitorial on rounding off numbers, I can request my daughter who is in elementary school to teach them.
sincerely,
Arunan.
Date: 27 May 2008, Subject: Ban on selling meat
Dear Sir,
This refers to the two Letters to the Editors published by you in response to the article by Mr. Tarunabh Khaitan. Mr. Guru Murthy says that the ban was for only nine days and need not be considered as an unreasonable curtailment of the rights of any community. Evidently, he considers that a ‘longer ban’ would be a curtailment. It is suprising to read this view from Mr. Gurumurthy choosing to live in the ‘land of the free’. Certainly, he misses the points eloquently put together by Mr. Khaitan. Our Constitution does not guarenty absolute rights to some and for others rights that can be negotiated. A Government banning the sale of meat to take care of the sentiments of a few is unreasonable in curtailing the others right to eat what they prefer. It does not matter whether it is for 9 minutes or 9 days. Mr. Rao says that the Author is questioning the Judgment without reference to the facts and arguments. Is Govenrment banning the sale of meat to take care of the sentiments of a few not a fact? or Is the Court upholding this ban not a fact? Your freedom ends where my nose begins. While it is absolutely alright for a group of people to form a housing society and live anyway they choose to do within their premises, Government can not impose these regulations, even temporarily, on the general public at large. Anyone who reads the article and these letters can see who has presented all the facts. Mr. Khaitan has presented the details of the Judgment and has been careful in reporting it as well. He has carefully stated where the emphasis is from the judgment and where it is his own. He has pointed out the contradictions within the Judgment. Unless such views are expressed, it would be assumed that there is no fundamental violation in such orders by the Governement and the Court. I would like to thank the Author for expressing these views and the Hindu for publishing it. I hope the Governments in the Centre and the States and the Courts take a serious note of the views expressed by the Author. Sincerely, E. Arunan
( http://www.hindu.com/2008/05/29/stories/2008052955441005.htm Link no longer works )
25 May 2009 Terror attacks in Mumbai (Not published)
Dear Editor,
The whole of India and the world is united in condemning the terror attacks in Mumbai that started on 26th November 2008 in the late hours of the day. While this is not the first time India has been attacked, two reports after this incidence show that India is finally ready to handle the terrorists with an Iron hand. Firstly, the opposition party, BJP has announced that this is not the time to play the blame game and we should be united in handling the situation. This is a departure in its response compares to all other incidents when it was not in power. After 9/11, the United States of America stood united in its response and it has not faced another attack since. Secondly, an officer had said that we will not negotiate with the terrorists. They either get killed or captured alive. Israel had declared this policy and it did not have to face any ‘hostage’ crisis. If we are united and deal with the terrorists firmly, I have no doubts in my mind that we will win this war on terror. I sincerely hope that India has the maturity today to continue on these lines.
E. Arunan
Date 9 March 2010 Subject: Oscar and women’s representation bill (not published)
I read the front page story on Oscar awards by Narayan Lakshman with interest as the top two contenders for the best film/director awards happened to be ex-husband-wife pair of James Cameroon and Kathryn Bigelow. For the first time in the history of Oscar, a lady has won the best director award. Interestingly, the news comes when our parliament is struggling to pass the Women’s representation bill. More interestingly, this story written by Narayan Lakshman highlights the importance of what the Yadav political leaders are fighting for. I consider the Hindu to be one of the most liberal newspapers when it comes to fighting for equal opportunities for women and the under-privileged section of the society. Even in this newspaper, the Oscar winner is misquoted. Bigelow dedicated the award to the women and men in the uniform world over. Lakshman quotes her as dedicating it to the men and women in the uniform world over. What is the difference, an insensitive man may ask. We are a country and society far from achieving equality for men and women and also for Indians cutting across caste, region, religion, language etc … Yadavs are probably rightly worried that the 33 % reservation for women may in fact go to the forward caste women. Irrespective of the caste, income, education our men are still insensitive and women are kind. Yadav’s are probably worried that the women, irrespective of their background, may be manipulated by men in our society. I hope as a country and society we can allay their fears. Sincerely, Arunan.
27 February 2010: canceling the air tickets (not published?)
Dear Sir,
I would like to bring to the attention of all the airlines the hassles in cancellation of air tickets. While one can book tickets for travel by bus/train/air online using credit cards, canceling the tickets for air-travel is made particularly hard for the commuters. Indian Railways, Government and private buses allow booking and cancellation of tickets online and the money is credited back to the bank account or credit card from where it was taken for booking. None of the major airlines allow cancellation of tickets online and the passenger is forced to go to the Airport or city offices for canceling the tickets. When some one cancels the ticket, why should he/she be forced to go the airport for canceling the ticket? Moreover, when a ticket is canceled the passengers are not given any details other than the promise that refund would be done in
1-2 weeks. One does not even get to know the amount that would be refunded. The ticket only has the total fare and does not list the fare for the onward and return. These fares are often different depending on what was available for each sector at the time of booking. I request all the airlines to streamline this cancellation process so that the process is more transparent. Customers should be able to cancel the ticket online. If Indian Railways can do this, I do not know why the airline companies can not do. They probably handle an insignificant number of passengers in comparison to the Railways.
sincerely,
Arunan. (Now all airlines allow cancellation)
Date 30 August 2010. Subject: Terrorism has no colors
I read the news in Hindu dated 28 August 2010, reporting Mr. Dwivedi’s statement that terrorism has only one colour and it is black. Apparently, it was part of a damage-control process following the home minister Mr. Chidambaram’s reference to ‘saffron terror’. I would have been happy if Mr. Dwivedi had said terrorism has no colour. Branding a group of people based on few extremes is always a dangerous practice. On reading this statement, I was reminded of what the one-time radical leader of African origin, born in Nebraska, U.S.A., Malcom X said about the historic prejudice about colours. Black is defined as dirty, evil, and wicked among the other meanings in most dictionaries. White is defined as pure and innocent, among the other meanings. After witnessing the racial discrimination on the black people of African origin, Malcom X pointed out that the dictionary written by the white people defines black and white in this way. Scientifically, black is pure and is the absence of colour. What you see is what you get. On the other hand white is deceptive and as everyone knows is a mixture of all the colours that it does not reveal. Due to the scattering process of light, when a rainbow appears in the sky, one can see all the colours that combine to form white. To his credit, Malcom X realized the danger of being a radical extreme and disavowed racism. There is no justification for terrorism, irrespective of which group or individual is responsible. It is important for a civil society not only to condemn it in the strongest terms but also to do all that is required to curb it. Sincerely, E. Arunan.
Link to published letter: http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/30/stories/2010083050321001.htm
Date: 29 September 2010 Subject: UID: Let no Indian fall at another’s feet (not published)
I was fortunate to watch the inaugural programme of the prestigious Unique Identity (UID) project this afternoon on live TV. The government has chosen to start this project from Tembhali village and the first UID numbers have been given to the laborers from the tribal area. While I was delighted at this symbolic gesture from the Government, I was deeply saddened to see the first few recipients falling at the feet of our Honorable Prime Minister and the leader of UPA Mrs. Sonia Gandhi.
I am convinced that neither our PM nor Mrs. Gandhi would have asked our fellow Indians to kneel before them and they may have done it on their own volition. However, in functions like this which is telecast live all over India, and may be the globe, it is not enough if our leaders do not ask participants not to fall at their feet. The participants should be advised, and if needed ordered, not to do this. Dr. Manmohan Singh has proven himself to be a man of simplicity and very high integrity and I am sure he would have been embarrassed by this act. Prime Minster is not doing a favor to any fellow citizen by handing out the UID number. It is the responsibility of any civil society and government to treat all its citizens with respect. I must add that it is not at all surprising, having seen these acts even at gathering of scientists, the so called educated elite, in India. However, only when every Indian can feel proud about being an Indian and holding his/her head high, irrespective of region, religion, colour, caste, creed, income, language, etc… We would have achieved a civilized nation. Sincerely, E. Arunan.
Date: 27 August 2011 Subject: Separation of State and Church.
I have given a link in my webpage (EA>Other Comments) which is not working anymore. I do not seem to have this letter in my emails any more. I think this was published.
13 October 2011 Attack on Bhushan caught on TV
Dear Sir/Madam,
While there can be no two opinion about condemning the outrageous attack on the eminent supreme court lawyer Prashant Bhushan, it appears a strange coincidence that the Times Now reporter was there with the camera to record the proceedings live. Though the Times Now Editor Mr. Goswami says that it was indeed a coincidence, would he accept an explanation like this from a politician in a situation like this? Wouldn’t he conclude without any doubt that it was stage managed?
sincerely,
Arunan.
8 November 2011 Koodangulam nuclear plant (not published)
Dear Editor,
While one may appreciate the efforts of Dr. Kalam to push the nuclear power plant, the news item in the front page of The Hindu dated 8 November 2011 is rather insensitive. The title (Boosting local economy to allay nuclear fears) is particularly insensitive. I can not believe a newspaper with the reputation of The Hindu would put this title in the front page. Is this a suggestion to buy the people? Is this what a scientist can suggest to ‘allay nuclear fear’?
sincerely,
Arunan.
9 January 2012: Election commission and symbol (not published)
Dear Sir/Madam,
I read with curiosity the news about election commission’s decision to cover up all statues of UP CM Smt. Mayavati and also the election symbol of her party elephant. How did this election commission permit the Congress party to have a symbol of ‘hand’. Is it going to be covering every one’s hand during the election day? How would people vote? They may have ordered the covering of our ex PM Sri. Vajpayee’s photograph on the highways. However, this looks like a biased act of the election commission. The photograph showing a person covering an elephant statue appears strange to me. If election commission was indeed impartial, they should cover up the hands that cover the elephant. Indeed, we are living in days of extremism from political parties, activists, election commission etc… I think the election commission should withdraw this order.
Arunan.
18 January 2012 Lawyers taking the law into their hand
Dear Sir/Madam,
I was shocked to read about the lawyer’s agitation. While a police man should not rough up people driving without a license, I am surprised that a lawyer was driving without a license. I hope the commissioner and the lawyer’s association would also probe the lawyer’s act of driving without a license and take appropriate action. It is ironic that a whole group of lawyers goes on agitating, supporting the cause of a lawyer who has defied the law!
Arunan.
25 March 2012 caste descriminarion
Dear Sir,
I read the open page comments on the prevailing caste based discrimination still felt by students in elementary school. Tamils were more progressive 2000 years back even considering the United States of America just 250 years back. The great sage Thiruvalluvar proclaimed that all lives are equal by birth (பிறப்பொக்கும் எல்லா உயிர்க்கும்). One can compare this to the opening statement of the Declaration of Independence by the USA. The founding fathers declared “We hold it to be self evident that all men are born equal”. President Obama when he took oath and addressed the Nation quoted this but removed ‘men’ in his speech. This is one of the reasons Tamils consider Thirukkural as a Veda. It is interesting that the comment by Priyadarshini mentions a teacher who changed the mark and also an enlightened friend who accompanied him to an Islam friend’s house for a briyani. Bharathiyar, the progressive Tamil poet fought against the system in the last century and Periyaar started the self-respect movement to oppose caste based discrimination. One can clearly see that the fight against such prejudice will continue and it is important for the country and society to do all that is needed to remove this prejudice.
sincerely,
Arunan.
22 June 2012: Is Prime Minister above law?
Dear Editor,
This refers to the opinion of Judge Katju published in The Hindu today.
Lately, many of the comments made by our former Supreme Court Judge, Justice Markandeay Katju surprise me. ‘No one is above law’ is as true as ‘The King can do no wrong’. I would interpret the ‘King can do no wrong’ as a message to the King that he can do no wrong rather than as a message to the legal system that no matter what the King does, do not touch him. I wonder if Judge Katju read reports which pointed out that the Pakistan Supreme Court had quoted Indian courts in pronouncing the judgement. I am sure Justice Katju is aware of the impeachment of President Nixon and the Allahabad court judgement that led to the dark chapter in Indian history. Perhaps he wanted the Allahabad Judge not to touch Indira Gandhi. The esteemed Judge’s opinion can only be interpreted by the leaders as a license to kill and I find it rather unfortunate.
sincerely,
Arunan.
23 August 2012 Freeman’s article on rape
Dear Editor,
I read the article by Hadley Freeman on Rape. He has managed to group the whistle blower with the right-wing politicians for whom fundamental rights of a woman have to be negotiated. While rape cannot be condoned irrespective of who the offender is or what the circumstances are, the charges against Julian Assange do appear to be motivated and choreographed.
sincerely, Arunan
30 August 2012 Dangers of mobile phone!?
Dear Editor,
I read the two recent articles on the Technical report given by an expert committee on the dangers of mobile phone usage. It is a pity that despite having six academies, so many reputed institutes and scientists, credible scientific information does not reach the policy makers in India. I wonder if everyone realizes that the visible light that helps us see, is radiation having orders of magnitude more energy than the microwave radiation used in telecommunication.
sincerely,
Arunan
17 September 2012 Don’t blame it on the professor
Dear Sir,
Happymon Jacob has given a fitting response to the flawed analysis given by Justice Katju. However, Jacob’s analysis and all the letters to the editors discussing ‘what really is 1/0’ misses one important point. Mr. Justice Katju had no business asking the maths lecturer this one question in maths and pronouncing his judgement about the quality of teaching. Without knowing the case, it would not be easy to determine if the question had any relevance to the case. One can only hope that the prejudice and arrogance displayed in this question did not cloud the eventual judgement of the case. If it did, there was no justice. An extreme definition of an expert is a person who knows everything about nothing. In our country, once some one becomes an expert in something, (s)he feels qualified in passing comments/judgements about everything under the sun.
sincerely,
Arunan.
12 October 2012 Justice Katju and Nobel prize
Dear Editor,
I liked the commentary by Judge Katju arguing for a secular country devoid of communal tension. Somewhat coincidentally, the Nobel peace prize has been given to European Union, despite the current unrest there, I hope India, Pakistan, Bangaldesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka can form an Indian Union or South Asian Union and learn to live with peace and prosperity. Even if we don’t get the Nobel prize, peace and prosperity for 1/4th of the world population has enormous value and no prize can match it.
sincerely,
Arunan.










